Prediction of Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Filip Veger Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Van De Zandschulp vs F. Veger

Botic Van De Zandschulp

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

478

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.7M

Career Money

$6.4K

Right-Handed

Plays

Filip Veger

CRO

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

478

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.7M

Career Money

$6.4K

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Veger

They have played 2 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 2 and Filip Veger winning 0. The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Filip Veger was at the Czech Republic F11, 01-12-2016, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Zandschulp	1
Veger	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(QF) Czech Republic F11(12-01-16)

Stats

Botic Van De Zandschulp

Filip Veger

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs F. Veger H2H Profile

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	F. Veger
$3,738,275	Career Prize Money	$6,370
60.83% (382-246)	Career Total W/L	51.37% (150-142)
1	Indoor	0
7	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
43.24% (16-21)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs F. Veger Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 45.24% of points on their second serve, while Filip Veger has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Botic Van De Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 46.17% of their opponent's second serve points, while Filip Veger has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.88% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Botic Van De Zandschulp has saved 55.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Filip Veger has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 48.44% of matches played (W/L 31/33), with Filip Veger winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Botic Van De Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 97/60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/15). Filip Veger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 37/27), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 19/19), where as Filip Veger has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 1 times and Filip Veger being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 2 and Filip Veger winning 0.
The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Filip Veger was at the Czech Republic F11, 01-12-2016, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 178.33 while Filip Veger has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Filip Veger has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Botic Van De Zandschulp has converted 30.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Filip Veger has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Filip Veger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs F. Veger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	F. Veger
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	7
3	Aces (Total)	1
3	Total Double Faults	3
1:26:0	Average Match Time	1:26:0
47% (24/51)	1st Serve %	67% (41/61)
71% (17/24)	1st Serve Win %	56% (23/41)
56% (15/27)	2nd Serve Win %	35% (7/20)
50% (5/10)	Break Pts Won %	67% (2/3)
51% (31/61)	Return Points Win %	37% (19/51)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

B. V. D. Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Hellenic Championship - Athens - 03-11-2025
R1 Stan WawrinkaS. Wawrinka	L	2-6 7-6(5) 7-5	Stats
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris - 27-10-2025
Q3 Ethan QuinnE. Quinn	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
Q1 Jenson BrooksbyJ. Brooksby	W	4-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel - 20-10-2025
R2 Reilly OpelkaR. Opelka	L	7-6(5) 6-7(7) 6-3	Stats
R1 Jiri LeheckaJ. Lehecka	W	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

F. Veger Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Serbia F4 (Zlatibor) - 28-08-2017
R1 Viktor FilipenkoV. Filipenko	L	6-2 7-6(3)	Stats
Czech Republic F12 - 05-12-2016
R2 Jan HernychJ. Hernych	L	7-5 3-0 ret.	Stats
R1 Arturs LazdinsA. Lazdins	W	6-2 6-4	Stats
Czech Republic F11 - 28-11-2016
QF Botic Van De ZandschulpB. Van	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
R2 Marc-Andrea HueslerM. Huesler	W	6-3 6-1	Stats

View All

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs F. Veger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	F. Veger
60.83% (382/246)	YTD Win/Loss	51.37% (150/142)
57.84% (874/637)	Sets Win/Loss	51.42% (345/326)
52.97% (7595/6742)	Games Win/Loss	51.71% (3210/2998)
57.81% (74/54)	Hard Win/Loss	57.81% (37/27)
61.59% (178/111)	Clay Win/Loss	39.19% (29/45)
64.13% (118/66)	Indoor Hard W/L	54.90% (84/69)
44.44% (12/15)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
0.45	Aces Per Game	0.2
3139	Aces Total	596
0.33	Double Faults Per Game	0.12
2297	Total Double Faults	362
1:36:56	Average Match Time	1st Match
180.18	Average Opponent Rank	659.68
62% (25788/41885)	1st Serve %	71% (7633/10810)
72% (18493/25788)	1st Serve Win %	67% (5120/7633)
48% (7758/16100)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (1538/3177)
43% (1881/4385)	Break Points Won % (Total)	43% (475/1098)
40% (17540/43322)	Return Points Win %	40% (4256/10660)
58.93% (33/23)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
48.21% (27/29)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
60.00% (12/8)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
51.30% (79/75)	Main Tour W/L	35.00% (7/13)
63.33% (76/44)	Challenger W/L	58.82% (60/42)
69.82% (155/67)	Futures W/L	48.82% (83/87)
62% (354/572)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	51% (147/288)
49% (21/43)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (1/2)
53% (108/205)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	43% (28/65)
57% (117/206)	Deciding Set Win %	47% (41/87)
89% (359/319)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (150/127)
11% (359/39)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (150/23)
23% (267/62)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (142/23)